ANB-BIA DOSSIER
ISSUE/EDITION Nr 320 - 15/03/1997
CONTENTS | ANB-BIA HOMEPAGE
Z A I R E
Actors and antagonists in Zaire: a reminder
by ANB-BIA, Brussels, March 1997 = Reproduction authorised,
with usual acknowledgement
PART 2/2
=====> Part 1/2: click here
2. NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES
A. Three countries accused of participating in the
rebellion
The involvement of Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi has been asserted
from the beginning by Zaire, and acknowledged even by the United
States which has demanded the withdrawal of all foreign forces.
RWANDA
The Rwandan Patriotic Front, (the movement and army of Tutsi
exiles, supported by Uganda), attacked Rwanda in 1990 and seized
power in 1994 after the genocide. More than a million Rwandan
refugees, and among them the soldiers of the former Rwandan army
and the interahamwe militia, settled in Zaire close to the
border. It was important, if not vital, for Rwanda to establish
a buffer zone in Eastern Zaire to defend itself against Hutu
raids. It is hardly likely that Rwanda intended to extend its
borders, though that possibility has been mentioned. It is
generally admitted that there has been some involvement of its
army on the side of the Zairian Banyarwanda, though the Rwandan
government has always denied this.
BURUNDI
On the other hand, the engagement of Burundian troops in Zaire,
is less probable given the guerilla war being waged within the
country. However, Burundi seems to have helped the rebels. After
the assassination of the president elect, Melchior Ndadaye, and
especially after the putsch of Pierre Buyoya, the Tutsi minority
seized power in Burundi. Many Burundians were refugees in Zaire,
and groups of Hutu guerillas had bases in the Uvira area. They
were expelled by the Zaire rebels.
UGANDA
The President of Uganda, Yoweri Museveni, a Hima (related to the
Tutsi) was powerfully helped by the exiled Rwandan Tutsi in the
civil war which swept him to power. In his turn, he helped them
when they invaded Rwanda and has maintained very good relations
with them. On the other side, small groups of Ugandan rebels
operating in the north of Uganda, who are helped by Sudan, had
their fall-back bases in north-east Zaire. Uganda has admitted
that it used the "right-of-pursuit", to cross the Zaire
border, but denies ever having participated actively in the
rebellion. One fact to be noted, however, is that Uganda has a
large rearmament programme. According to some sources, it spends
up to 30% of its national budget on arms. The government
justifies this by saying that it has to modernise its army, to
meet the challenge of the Ugan-dan rebels and the threats from
Sudan.
FRAME 3 : Rwandan and Ugandan soldiers in
Zaire
The presence of Rwandan and Ugandan soldiers among the Alliance
forces, almost from the beginning of the rebellion, has been
attested by observers who were present in Bukavu and Goma. Those
soldiers betrayed their nationality by the language they spoke
and sometimes by loose talk.
In January, refering to non-Zairian soldiers fighting with the
AFDL, an eyewitness told us: "All the soldiers one met,
were Tutsi; they spoke Kinyarwanda among themselves. If they
spoke very poor Kiswahili, it was a sign that they came from
Rwanda; if they spoke very well, with sophisticated words which
local people did not understand, they came either from Tanzania
or Uganda... At Goma and Bukavu, crossing the border is done
discretely and generally at night by trucks with Zaire
registration plates or without any registration plates. It is
quite common, however, to see a truck with Rwandan plates... When
a rebel military vehicle appears even during the day, at the
Rwandan border at Gisenyi or Cyangugu, the barrier is immediately
raised and it passes without any checking... It is obvious to
people in Goma that it is not merely a question of a
"rebellion" in Zaire by Zairians, but an invasion of
Zaire by other countries".
Be that as it may, a comment by Colette Braeckman, a journalist
with Belgium's Le Soir, is revealing. She writes in Le
Soir, 24 February 1997: "The war in Rwanda and then
the genocide, have increased tensions: young Hutu living in Zaire
were enroled in the army of Habyarimana in 1990, but,
particularly, thousands of young Tutsi have swelled the ranks of
the FPR. A good number of Tutsi are to be found in the ranks of
the Alliance. Are they originally from Zaire or have they come
directly from Rwanda or even Uganda? It would be a clever person
who could tell the difference. In fact, the participation of
Tutsi refugees living in Uganda since 1959, or Uganda citizens,
is a matter of dispute. But Uganda harbours not only Tutsi; there
are also Azande people who straddle the frontier with Upper
Zaire, and among them also, refugees who are also fighting with
the Alliance. Besides, after 1960, many Lumumbist militants
sought refuge in Uganda and their descendants are now engaged in
the fighting. How can these descendants who speak English be
classified? Are they Ugandans or Zairians?"
At any rate, if it is doubtless difficult to prove a permanent
presence of Rwandan or Ugandan armed forces in the Zaire
rebellion, the rebels can at least count on substantial
logistical support and involvement of those two countries.
END OF FRAME 3
B. Other African Countries
ANGOLA
In Angola's lengthy civil war, Mobutu, for a long time supported
Jonas Savimbi's UNITA. On the other hand, former Katanga
Gendarmes, under the banner of the National Liberation Front of
Congo, were fighting for years in the army of the Angolan
government. Not far from Tshikapa in Kasaï, one of the chief
diamond centres, they were only waiting for a sign from the
former Simba, L. Kabila, to cross the frontier and attack the
forces of Mobutu. This was confirmed by sources close to Kabila.
Savimbi's troops were posted to guard the border. At the end of
February, it was reported that a large number of former Katanga
Gendarmes (estimated at 1,500-4,000) had arrived in Bukavu,
having crossed Uganda and Tanzania.
SUDAN
Sudan has for years had military pacts with Zaire. But since
January, it has had to deal with a strong upsurge of the
rebellion in the South, and attacks by opposition forces united
under the National Democratic Alliance.
MOROCCO
At the beginning of February, Mobutu paid a visit to the King of
Morocco, probably to ask for help. It was even said that planes
were ready to transport Moroccan troops as well as Togolese and
Chadians, to Zaire. Those countries, however, have denied that
they are ready to send troops.
LIBYA
In December 1996, Colonel Ghadafi disclosed: "If President
Mobutu is driven from power, the lot of Zaire would be the same
as that of Somalia after Siad Barre, and Yugoslavia after
Tito".
In February, a message of gratitude from Mobutu
was published in Libya, and Ghadafi expressed his support for
Zaire and its President. Observers interpret that to mean that
Libya's support has become more substantial, and some reports
speak of help from Iran and Iraq, channelled through Libya.
3. INTERNATIONAL
The differences between the stance of France and the
United States has often been aired; it is seen as a struggle for
influence.
FRANCE
After the independence of African countries, France has always
continued to play an important role in Africa where it has
stationed military units, which on several occasions have
intervened to save governments in difficulty (as recently in The
Central African Republic). In the Great Lakes region, France has
always supported Mobutu, and also former president Habyarimana
of Rwanda. Some say that "Operation Turquoise" was
undertaken to protect the former Rwandan army. It also seems to
be counting on a post Mobutu era, which will be legalised by
elections, in which Kengo wa Dondo will remain in command.
Together with Belgium, France was more in favour of sending
United Nations forces and giving help to the Rwandan refugees.
UNITED STATES
For a long time, the United States was not very much interested
in Africa. But in recent years, this interest has certainly
increased. To counter forms of Islamic extremism, it has adopted
a position towards Sudan, in supporting forces opposed to
Khartoum þ forces which are also helped by Eritrea, Ethiopia and
Uganda. Last year, it launched the idea that it would bankroll
an African force to keep the peace in Africa. France was unhappy
about this plan. In enormously mineral-rich Zaire, the United
States has long supported Mobutu as a bulwark against Communism
in Africa. (Former-president Bush is a member of the Advisor
Council of Canadian-American Company Barrick Gold Corporation,
which operates in the gold-bearing area of Bunia). But now it
appears that the USA is basing its African policy on Uganda and
the new powers in Rwanda. And it appears to want to leave the
field clear for the rebels in Zaire.
The Anglo-Saxon countries have also been the most
reticent about a United Nations intervention force in the Great
Lakes crisis.
The position adopted by France and the USA has since come closer
together. The whole international community, including the United
States, defends the territorial integrity of Zaire, and condemns
all outside interference.
UN and OAU
The UN Secretary-General has appointed a special representative,
Mr Mohammed Sahnoun, for the Great Lakes region.
The Organisation of African Unity has called on four African
countries (South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya and Cameroon) to form
a peace committee for that region. At the end of February,
President Mandela of South Africa invited Laurent Kabila and a
representative of President Mobutu, to meet separately with South
African and USA authorities.
On 19 February 1997, the UN Security Council accepted a Peace
Plan proposed by Mr Sahnoun. It includes five points: 1. an
immediate cease-fire; 2. withdrawal of all foreign forces; 3.
territorial integrity of all the countries of the region; 4.
protection of refugees; 5. the organisation of an international
peace conference.
FRAME 4 : ZAIRE - SHORT
CHRONOLOGY
18 October '96 - Fighting breaks out around Uvira.
26 October - The rebels capture Uvira.
30 October - Bukavu is taken by the rebels.
1 November - Goma falls to the rebels.
20 November - Hundreds of thousands of Rwandese refugees
return to Rwanda.
3 December - The rebels announce that Bunia has been
captured
12 December - Rwandese refugees in Tanzania flee from
their camps. They are repatriated to Rwanda. The first wave of
refugees arrives at Lubutu/Ting-Tingi.
17 December - President Mobutu returns to Zaire.
31 December - It is confirmed that Bunia has been captured
by the rebels
2 January '97 - The government in Kinshasa announces a
"devastating" counter-offensive.
3 January - Rebel forces are reported to be at Watsa and
Bafwasende.
25 January - Fighting around the River Oso.
3 February - Kalemie and Watsa are captured by the
rebels.
6 February - The rebels take Shabunda.
11 February - Isiro is taken by the rebels.
17 February - Mercenaries shell Bukavu.
22 February - Kalima is captured by the rebels.
28 February - Kindu falls to the rebels. The refugees
leave Tingi-Tingi camp.
Compiled by ANB-BIA, Brussels, March 1997 - Reproduction
authorised, with usual acknowledgement
END
CONTENTS | ANB-BIA HOMEPAGE
PeaceLink 1997 -
Reproduction authorised, with usual
acknowledgement