ANB-BIA SUPPLEMENT

ISSUE/EDITION Nr 322 - 15/04/1997

CONTENTS | ANB-BIA HOMEPAGE

Mozambique

Re-vamping the Armed Forces delayed

by Joao de Brito Langa, Mozambique, Nov. 1996

THEME = ARMY

INTRODUCTION

The Government has withdrawn its proposed Bill on National Defence and the Armed Forces, because the opposition RENAMO says it's not constitutional.

RENAMO strongly objected to the "package" presented by Government to Parliament, in its fifth and last session for 1996. The Bill þ a "package" of three proposals had been put before Members, and dealt with: 1. National Defence and the Armed Forces; 2. Military Service; 3. A form of National Service, involving participation in construction and development projects. RENAMO argued that the proposed Bill was contrary to the Republic's Constitution, and specifically against Article 135, which states that policies of national defence and security, can only be specified after consultation with the National Council for Defence and Security. When Parliament began its 5th session on 28 October 1996, this had not yet been done.
Government realised that there was no agreement on such an important matter, so the Minister for Defence, Aguiar Mazula, went before Parliament to withdraw the Bill.

Interview

Following the withdrawal of the proposed Bill, Minister Mazula gave the following interview with the daily Noticias.

Q = Minister, what were the reasons for the Government to withdraw the draft Bill on National Defence and the Armed Forces? R = Basically, we consider that the Constitution under which we all live can only work if everyone agrees to it. The same goes for this Bill on National Defence. From my own observations, it was clear there was no agreement in this present matter and so I withdrew the Bill.

Q = But isn't the Government maintaining its position that the proposed Bill is in accordance with the Constitution? R = Exactly. We consider that all we did was to bring before Parliament a proposed Bill and so, in this respect, we see nothing against the Constitution.

Q = What are the immediate implications of this decision by Government to withdraw the Bill?
R = As Minister of Defence, I believe that the implications are rather worrying and serious. The Armed Forces were expecting us to have begun a whole programme of modernisation and re-organisation. They were also expecting us to have clearly spelled out the role of the Armed Forces.

Q = So what's going to happen now?
R = We've got problems. Our whole effort has been directed towards uniting the Armed Forces. We want them to be outside politics. There's also a certain amount of dissatisfaction within the ranks. There are many soldiers, especially privates, who are leaving. I want to strengthen the Army and I can't do this because I don't have the legal backing to carry through necessary reforms.

Q = As far as we can gather, Government has serious problems in maintaining an operational army.
R = Yes, because everyone recognises that there is an urgent need to reorganise and establish motives for self-discipline among service personnel.

Q = So what can Government do?
R = I must say that officers at a General Staff level are beginning to understand that Government is subject to certain limitations. It can't do everything it wants.

Q = When you went before Parliament, Minister, you showed some concern in referring to the enormous expectations on the part of our regional partners. Would you be more explicit?
R = "Regionalism" in an international context, is very much part of the African scene these days, and Mozambique must be there too, especially as regards regional defence. There have already been meetings between the Armed Forces of the various countries so as to open the way for working together, but I am afraid that in this respect, Mozambique is lagging behind everyone else in the region.

Q = Government has withdrawn its proposed Bill for re-vamping the Armed Forces, so now, where is the way forward?
R = I hope there is an awarenessand and a sense of responsibility among Honourable Members, that the government's proposed Bill can once again be placed before Parliament as soon as possible. Government can do nothing without the guidance and decision of Parliament. I consider that the discussions presently taking place in Parliament are merely "political" - i.e. opposition for opposition's sake! It's clear that no attempt has been made to analyze the Nation's real needs. Times are changing and as far as defence and protection of the Nation are concerned, I want to draw the attention of Honourable Members to the need for change.

END

CONTENTS | ANB-BIA HOMEPAGE

PeaceLink 1997 - Reproduction authorised, with usual acknowledgement